{"id":6197,"date":"2010-08-10T14:56:28","date_gmt":"2010-08-10T21:56:28","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.survival-spot.com\/survival-blog\/?p=6197"},"modified":"2013-02-04T21:13:48","modified_gmt":"2013-02-05T04:13:48","slug":"relationships-improve-odds-of-survival-by-50-percent-research-finds","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.survival-spot.com\/survival-blog\/relationships-improve-odds-of-survival-by-50-percent-research-finds\/","title":{"rendered":"Relationships Improve Your Odds of Survival by 50 Percent, Research Finds"},"content":{"rendered":"<h2>ScienceDaily (July 28, 2010) \u2014 A new Brigham Young University study adds our social relationships to the &#8220;short list&#8221; of factors that predict a person&#8217;s odds of living or dying.<!--more--><\/h2>\n<p>In the journal PLoS Medicine, BYU professors Julianne Holt-Lunstad and Timothy Smith report that social connections &#8212; friends, family, neighbors or colleagues &#8212; improve our odds of survival by 50 percent. Here is how low social interaction compares to more well-known risk factors:<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li> Equivalent to smoking 15 cigarettes a day<\/li>\n<li> Equivalent to being an alcoholic<\/li>\n<li> More harmful than not exercising<\/li>\n<li> Twice as harmful as obesity<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<blockquote><p>&#8220;The idea that a lack of social relationships is a risk factor for death is still not widely recognized by health organizations and the public,&#8221; write the PLoS Medicine editors in a summary of the BYU study and why it was done.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>The researchers analyzed data from 148 previously published longitudinal studies that measured frequency of human interaction and tracked health outcomes for a period of seven and a half years on average. Because information on relationship quality was unavailable, the 50 percent increased odds of survival may underestimate the benefit of healthy relationships.<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>&#8220;The data simply show whether they were integrated in a social network,&#8221; Holt-Lunstad said. &#8220;That means the effects of negative relationships are lumped in there with the positive ones. They are all averaged together.&#8221;<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>Holt-Lunstad said there are many pathways through which friends and family influence health for the better, ranging from a calming touch to finding meaning in life.<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;When someone is connected to a group and feels responsibility for other people, that sense of purpose and meaning translates to taking better care of themselves and taking fewer risks,&#8221; Holt-Lunstad said.<\/p>\n<p>In examining the data, Smith took a careful look at whether the results were driven primarily by people helping each other prolong their golden years.<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;This effect is not isolated to older adults,&#8221; Smith said. &#8220;Relationships provide a level of protection across all ages.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>Smith said that modern conveniences and technology can lead some people to think that social networks aren&#8217;t necessary.<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>&#8220;We take relationships for granted as humans &#8212; we&#8217;re like fish that don&#8217;t notice the water,&#8221; Smith said. &#8220;That constant interaction is not only beneficial psychologically but directly to our physical health.&#8221;<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>Brad Layton worked on the study as an undergrad at BYU and appears as a co-author on the new study. Layton&#8217;s involvement in this project helped him secure a spot as a Ph.D. candidate in the highly ranked epidemiology program at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill.<\/p>\n<p>[Via <a href=\"http:\/\/www.sciencedaily.com\/releases\/2010\/07\/100727174909.htm?sms_ss=twitter\" class=\"broken_link\">ScienceDaily.com<\/a>]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>ScienceDaily (July 28, 2010) \u2014 A new Brigham Young University study adds our social relationships to the &#8220;short list&#8221; of factors that predict a person&#8217;s odds of living or dying.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[195,394],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-6197","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-news","category-survivalism"],"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.survival-spot.com\/survival-blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/6197","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.survival-spot.com\/survival-blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.survival-spot.com\/survival-blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.survival-spot.com\/survival-blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.survival-spot.com\/survival-blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=6197"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.survival-spot.com\/survival-blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/6197\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.survival-spot.com\/survival-blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=6197"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.survival-spot.com\/survival-blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=6197"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.survival-spot.com\/survival-blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=6197"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}