Killing The Food Supply: The Dangers of Genetically Modified Food

Anthony Gucciardi
May 10, 2010

Genetically modified food has entered the food supply through secrecy and deception. Some claimed that genetically modifying the food supply could even put an end to world hunger. At first glance, genetic modification really does look like a great idea. It allows for larger crops, enhanced growing seasons, and even bigger animals. The truth of the matter is that genetically modified food has been shown to sterilize the population, lead to infant mortality, and exacerbate the usage of pesticides on a global scale.

Food Abomination

The world is quickly realizing that there is no benefit to consuming and producing genetically modified food. The consumers are speaking out, and their voice is being heard. Food free of genetically modified ingredients is the fastest growing retail brand.

As the information surrounding GM (genetically modified) food rose to the mainstream media, the people began to anger. They were looking for someone to blame for allowing this atrocity occur, and they had to look no farther than Monsanto.

The Monsanto corporation is a multinational agricultural biotechnology corporation. It is responsible for producing and selling genetically engineered seeds.

These are the seeds that yield genetically modified crops. Monsanto has such a grip on the industry, that it produces 90% of the United State’s genetically engineered seeds. This is the same company responsible for the development of bovine growth hormone, which incited mass controversy over its effects. It was determined by many health experts to be extremely dangerous, with many linking it to cancer and other life-threatening conditions.

Numerous studies have proven genetically modified foods to be an extreme health hazard, but one must only look at how it is created to realize how unsafe GM food really is.

How It Is Made

The following is an excerpt from Blind Health: Forbes Magazine Declares Monsanto Company of the Year, an article I authored that exposes GM foods. The article was featured on multiple top news websites.

The bioengineering process itself is quite ridiculous. Billions are spent each year to genetically modify the food supply, tainting it with genetically modified frankenfood. Genetically modifying foods requires one to tamper with the very genetic coding of the crop and/or seed. The process entails the transfer of genes from one organism to another, such as taking particular genes from a pig and transferring them to a tomato. Not only does this defile nature, but it leads to a host of health problems.

Due to the complexity of a living organism’s genetic structure, it is impossible to track the long-term results of consuming genetically modified food. Introducing new genes into even the most simple bacterium may cause an array of issues, highlighting the complexity of even the simplest organisms. Introducing new genes to highly complex organisms such as animals or crops is even riskier.

When introducing the gene to its new host, it is essentially impossible to predict the reaction. The genetic intelligence of the host could be disrupted with the introduction of the new gene, creating an adverse reaction. There is truly no way of knowing the long-term effect genetically modified food, as there are too many variables. There is simply no room for science when Monsanto is involved.

The World Takes Action

What the world is beginning to see is a swift call to action against not only genetic modification of the food supply, but against the contamination of our food supply worldwide. The people are beginning to demand that high fructose corn syrup be taken out of their food, and that aspartame be removed from products like diet soda and chewing gum. Big corporations love to push such food abominations upon us, but sooner or later the citizens demand action.

India has recently begun to recognize the dangers of genetically modified food, calling for a multitude of scientific studies to determine whether or not the food poses a threat. The people of India had been calling for a change that the government was forced to recognize.

“Public sentiment is negative. It is my duty to adopt a cautious, precautionary, principle-based approach,” said Environment Minister Jairam Ramesh.

Even in the United States, Monsanto is currently under investigation by seven states. Since so many concerned citizens are demanding something to be done about genetically modified, the government of your nation is forced to respond. Through activism and spreading the word, genetically modified food can easily be made a sad mistake of the past.

[Via Infowars.com]

4 Responses

  1. johnny b

    This sounds a bit hysterical. No proof offered only allegations. Human beings are lining up to genetically altered if cures can be found for what ails them. Monsanto appears to be a convenient scapegoat, undoubtedly not the only company that could be accused of harming the food supply. This rates up there with organic farming which is a hoax and which has spawned the frequent outbreaks of e. coli in vegetables; particularly lettuce and spinach.
    Any problem in which the "world takes action" is most likely no problem at all. Of course the usual suspects are mentioned e.g. big corporations, etc. These are the faceless enemies liberals love to accuse and then take money from to promote their own destruction.

    It's a crazy world out there. If this blog has any credibility at all then it seems that any food in a crisis will be something to be thankful for.

    Reply
  2. Tim

    I have to agree with most of what John has to say (except for the liberal bit – I consider myself very left, but I am certainly last to attack generically).
    There is little evidence of GM food causing harm to the bulk of society. In fact, if you removed all GM food from the market, you'd basically have little left to buy. We've been genetically modifying food as long as we have farmed. Very few consumed fresh products look a great deal like their natural ancestral forms. I will admit that there has been some issues; grain stock that was genetically modified to produce nut protein to increase the nutrient content in poorer countries did have a backlash of causing nut related allergic reactions. However, this is far from Franken-food killing as off.
    I agree that producing purple cauliflower (etc) to make it more appealing to children is stupid and appeals only to poor parenting, however, without selecting the most useful genes we certainly would not have been able to feed such an overwhelming population that we've achieved and we would be subject to constant famine with agriculture being nothing short of a war against disease and pest outbreaks.

    Reply
  3. Russ

    "[Via Infowars.com]"

    no need to read further…..

    Reply
  4. Charles La Rue

    You should see what happens to hamsters who are fed GMO corn. The first generation has fewer puppies and are generally sick. The second generation has even fewer pups. The third generation is sterile and has hair growing inside their mouths. No fooling. Check this link and look at the photo of the poor hamsters.
    http://www.responsibletechnology.org/utility/show

    Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.